|
The Eurasian race is the most progressive race. Since all civilization
originated on the Eurasian continent, through the collective will of the
blood of the Eurasian peoples, one can clearly establish that the
Eurasians, as a whole, constitute one race. This race is divided into
several subraces, for example the Nordic (Aryan) one, the Semitic one,
the Turkic one, the Oriental one. Of course, one also has to understand
that the Eurasian root race is the Hyperborean one. Without the strident
aggressiveness of the Nordic subrace, the Eurasian race would not be
where it ended up - on top of the human pyramid. Hence, the Nordic
subrace is the one that naturally should be the vanguard of Eurasia in
the future, as it has been in the past. Joseph Stalin acknowledged this
when he said (in a speech in the Kremlin to commanders of the Red Army
on May 24, 1945), "Most of all, I drink to the health of the
Russian nation because it is the preeminent nation of all the nations of
the Soviet Union." Since the Russian people (nation) are a part of
the Nordic subrace and the Soviet Union was the epitomical homeland of
the Eurasian race, it is obvious that Stalin understood the vanguard
role that the Nordic subrace plays in Eurasia.
One should not for one moment suppose that negroes make up a progressive
race. Even Karl Marx himself agreed on this point, as is evident in his
views on slavery: "As for slavery, there is no need for me to speak
of its bad aspects. The only thing requiring explanation is the good
side of slavery. I do not mean indirect slavery, the slavery of
proletariat; I mean direct slavery, the slavery of the Blacks in
Surinam, in Brazil, in the southern regions of North America. ...
Slavery is therefore an economic category of paramount importance.
Without slavery, North America, the most progressive nation, would be
transformed into a patriarchal country." (from a letter to Pavel
Vasilyevich Annenkov, 1846) Obviously, Marx argues that the enslavement
of negroes was a prerequisite for the emancipation of a predominantly
White AmeriKa. Without the backs of negroes on which to unload labor,
White American men would be forced to toil unnecessarily. White American
women would thus be deprived of the chance to exert an influence equal
to that of the men. Without the negroes' work, women would have to stay
at home and take care of the households themselves, instead of being
productive in positions that would enable them to realize a communal way
of life. Through the progressive element of slavery, women were freed
from the shackles of their social roles as housewives and property of
working men.
This view is decidedly materialist in that it acknowledges the
evolutionary hierarchy that divides humanity into higher and lower
races. It is definitely non-Marxist behavior to pretend that all races
are equal. Since Marx was a Lamarckian, meaning he believed that
acquired traits were inherited, it is not surprising that he held views
that many leftist Communists would consider "racist." In
contrast to the Trotskyite multiculturalist nonsense, the Soviet Union
made great advances in racial science, in part influenced by the
revolutionary breakthroughs of the Third Reich in this field.
The only race that can be considered a "root race" is the
Nordic subrace. It was the Nordic subrace that was directly responsible
for the greatest and most original achievements in Eurasian history. The
Nordic subrace managed to infiltrate the other subraces' social strata
and assume leadership positions in their respective societies. The
red-haired mummies in China are but one example of the Nordic legacy
that was behind the foundation of all great civilizational achievements
on the Eurasian continent. The Nordic subrace is a "root race"
because at its roots, deep down and far back in time, Eurasia owes its
greatness exclusively to Nordic blood and genius.
CAPTAIN RUSSIA
the ideal worker in the Soviet Union
the Nordic worker
evident in sculptures throughout the former
empire
"his shield a weapon of glory"
"is he a person or a nation of workers?"
Libertarian free White AmeriKa as the vanguard in action
Nordic settlers frontiered
de-Indianized the West
Soviet enlightened Russia the brother brooding
CAPTAIN AMERICA asks CAPTAIN RUSSIA:
"Where is the line of demarcation?"
A bridge across the Bering Strait!
The Bloody Baron: Baron von Ungern-Sternberg, who viewed himself as the
reincarnation of Genghis Khan, hated Bolsheviks and Jews equally. He
equated the two. He killed, tortured and mutilated countless innocent
Bolsheviks and Jews. Nevertheless, he wanted to create a Eurasian
empire, a Buddhist empire with Nordic Russians as the ruling class. It
is ironic that the very people he despised (Bolsheviks and Jews) were
able to create the very empire that he failed to create.
The Bloody Baron: warrior Buddhist, follower of the 16th Path of
Oblivion, mad, on fire. An Aryan soul in search of power. A will to
solve, to obliterate to build, to drink to deny. Had cripples killed so
that they could be reincarnated whole again.
While today Persia continues to be occupied by Islam, von Ungern-Sternberg
wanted to liberate the peasants of Russia from the Semitic infection
they suffered from, namely Orthodoxy. Buddhism, an ancient Aryan
religion (before the Dalai Lamas perverted and mongrelized it), would
have been able to repurify the healthy Nordic instincts within the
Eurasian landmass. The Bolsheviks were also quite successful in
eradicating the disease of Orthodoxy, albeit not in the noble way that
von Ungern-Sternberg envisioned. European atheism is Aryan Buddhism
minus the cosmic spirit of belonging.
While contemporary Muslim savages blow up statues of the great Aryan
sage, von Ungern-Sternberg wanted to blow up shrines of materialism and
replace them with sanctified temples where worship of the umpteenth
faces of the Bhudda would have been mandatory.
- Constantin von Hoffmeister
|