|
"The ethnification of the social (we Germans or the aliens) is an
update and socio-political application of Carl Schmitt's friend-enemy
distinction as the essence of the political - and also as the essence of
the social state."
-- Juergen W. Gansel
"For evolved man -- the apex of organic progress on the Earth --
what branch of reflection is more fitting than that which occupies only
his higher and exclusively human faculties? The primal savage or ape
merely looks about his native forest to find a mate; the exalted Aryan
should lift his eyes to the worlds of space and consider his relation to
infinity!!!!"
-- H. P. Lovecraft
Some argue that Trotskyites have more in common with National
Revolutionaries than Stalinists do. This is because Stalinism is the
epitome of Russian imperialism and everything this entails, like the
subjugation of independent nations and the crushing of national
self-determination (as was the case in Hungary where the revolution was
a social nationalist anti-Stalinist Trotskyite one). Early Trotsky
(before he turned traitor and semi-Fascist turncoat) was a true National
Bolshevik. After all, the Red Army was his creation: a militant bulwark
against the capitalist exploiter beasts. His idea of workers councils is
also more in tune with the European spirit of socialism. Stalinist
bureaucracy resembles the rule of a centralized Asian khanate.
German National Marxist Reinhold Oberlercher is correct in his
assessment that the Bolshevik Revolution was an anti-capitalist
counterrevolution which introduced the Asiatic Mode of Production (AMP)
on an industrial basis. Highly centralized and autocratic, the economic
administration of the Soviet Union did not allow for autonomy or the
emergence of an independent economic life, both hallmarks of a truly
progressive industrialized nation. Thus, the Soviet Union became a
fossilized structure, burdened with a bureaucracy that did not speed up
processes of production but burdened the state with the
institutionalized incompetence of oligarchic party cadres.
East German dissident and former SED functionary Rudolf Bahro, who was
imprisoned in the GDR for constructively criticizing the state, argued
that Communism was a church. Just like the church became corrupted over
the years, so Communism lost its original ideals in the periodic
solidification of the Soviet state. But just like the Grand Inquisitor
could not hurt the image of Christ as a savior, Stalin could not destroy
the righteous nature of Marx's ideology. Just because the Communist
"church" was once repressive does not mean that one has to
become an anti-Communist. As Bahro notes, Francis of Assisi, while
opposed to the degenerative nature of the Catholic Church, still
remained loyal to it. The crux of the matter is freedom of opinion: If
it does not exist, democratic centralism has failed.
Belgian geopolitician Jean Thiriart put forth an Hegelian argument:
Racist National Socialism was the thesis and Marxist Communism the
antithesis. Thus, the synthesis must be elitist and imperial Communism.
Thiriart was right, of course. Only with the brutal efficiency of
National Socialism, coupled with the universal appeal of Marxism, can a
future Eurasian empire be constructed and maintained successfully. While
Communism was evidently inefficient economically, it nevertheless
succeeded in creating an imperial mythology that was able to
patriotically mobilize all its citizens. While National Socialism was
extremely efficient economically and technologically, it did not succeed
in overcoming its inherently nationalist and chauvinist nature. Thus,
historical National Socialism was not suited for an imperial ideology.
Communism, on the other hand, was. But a future Communism for overmen
can only survive if it employs National Socialist methods in terms of
state management.
EURO-RUSSIA:
the beast with two heads,
a white breast,
two claws
(in one a sword,
in the other the world)
wings spread,
soaring into the sun!
With the rise of Stalin, the ideology of the Soviet Union shifted into a
decidedly imperial direction. National Bolshevism is an imperial (but
anti-imperialist) ideology while National Communism is an anti-imperial
ideology. National Bolshevism, as established by the Red Tsar Stalin,
was based upon the Great Rus principle: Russia as the Third Rome, the
center and guiding light for the oppressed masses on the great continent
where all Hyperborean traditions had their origins. National Communists
decried the so-called "Moscow dictatorship" and actively
endorsed separatist tendencies within the Soviet empire and the Warsaw
Pact. The KPD/ML of East Germany (under the leadership of the National
Communist Ernst Aust) postulated that the rule of the leadership of the
GDR was illegitimate since it considered it consisting of vassals of
Moscow. In a sense, the KPD/ML was right. After all, the GDR was still
occupied by Soviet forces, and Germany was still divided and not a
neutral country. However, the claim of the KPD/ML that the GDR was a
"social Fascist" state that did the bidding of a "social
Fascist" Soviet Union is ridiculous. By pretending that Germany was
the focal point and actually something that needed to be saved from an
imperialist and capitalist AmeriKa and a "social Fascist"
Soviet Union, the KPD/ML displayed its infantile belief in the primacy
of nations as entities. It did not understand that nations are concepts
that betray the imperial destiny of the worker as the creator of a new
cosmos. The KPD/ML was essentially reactionary as it viewed the
nationalist principle (the good of Germany) as being above the
inter-nationalist axiom (the good of the empire). Nationalism is an
ideological relict of the bourgeoisie while inter-nationalism is the
guiding philosophy of proletarian imperialism. In this context, it is
interesting to note that a large number of the imperial Communists
(National Bolsheviks) who struggled in the Ukraine against the
nationalist Communists (National Communists) were assimilated Jews. In
this light, it makes sense why Stalin made anti-Judaism a criminal
offense. While National Communism merely adapts Communism to further
reactionary and backwards nationalist causes, National Bolshevism is a
universal Eurasian philosophy that supercedes nations and ushers in the
Messianic age of universal proletarian domination and liberation.
National Communist traitors were at work in Hungary, and they were
justifiably crushed by the imperial glory of the Red Salvation Army.
Ukrainians are Russians, and the Ukraine is an integral part of Russia.
The same goes for Belarus. It is precisely nationalists that play the
game of divisiveness. Ukrainian nationalist separatism must be crushed!
Stalin did not support Muscovite imperialism and neither does the modern
National Bolshevik movement. On the contrary, National Bolshevism
promotes the Eurasian ideal which is imperial but not imperialist. The
Eurasian ideal is aimed at the future while acknowledging the fruits of
the past.
finally:
the vanquished victim
vaporizes the victor!
The Soviet Union was not nationalist but imperial. The difference
between these two terms is huge. While the former has chauvinist and
exclusive connotations, the latter has messianic and inclusive (but on
the basis of a common acceptance that ethnic diversity is a prerequisite
for an ethnopluralist socialist empire) connotations.
The Soviet Union (arguably the most important fortress of Communism) was
a federation of several nations. Of course, the Russian nation was the
avantgarde nation.
Merely because the Soviet member states had a strong sense of group
identity (which was encouraged by the various party leaderships) does
not mean that they were nationalist. Their loyalties were always to the
Soviet Union as a whole (the empire) first. In the Soviet Union, the
preservation and veneration of empire transcended the worship of
individual nations. Hence, Soviet Communism was not nationalist, not
even among the different states that comprised the federation.
Kaliningrad/Koenigsberg:
eternal city
where ideologies met
clashed
and merged
EUROPIA!
capital and dome...
The Russians were the master race in the Soviet empire. Just as Russian
was the official language, Russian culture was the leading culture (but
not primitively forced upon like contemporary American
"culture" like McDonald's). Euro-Siberian Marxism-Leninism is
a movement that shines into the future like a godly torch in the darkest
Middle Ages. Stalin was also an ethnopluralist who did not deny the
existence of different races. The following quote, which can be read at
the Soviet memorial in Treptow Park in Berlin, shows this:
"The ideology which is rooted in our country is the ideology of
equality between all races and nations, the ideology of the friendship
of the peoples has won the victory over the Hitler-Fascist ideology of
bestial nationalism and racial hatred."
The Prolet-Aryan is the creator and sustainer who destroys the old
order, paving the way for the new and improved. He lends a guiding hand
to the lesser races, elevating them with his own ascent to godhood. The
red flag of socialism is the flag of blood, the blood that flows in the
veins of the Aryan worker-soldiers of the coming empire of war, struggle
and conquest. Like the socialist flag, Mars is red. Mars is not only a
planet but also the god of war. Hence, war must be declared in the name
of blood and the red planet colonized in the name of socialism. Yuri
Gagarin showed us the way. We must follow!
the Aryan anointed
in the soil of the sagas
technology truth trust
born the blade that burns
everlasting
holy
Amen.
- Constantin von Hoffmeister
|