|
"It is not a matter of historical events or whether or not they
took place. The point is that everyone should be able to make anything a
'res publica.' This must not be a matter for the prosecutors and
judges."
-- Peter Toepfer (at the Holocaust Conference in Tehran, 2006)
"I do not admit (...) that a great wrong has been done to the Red
Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that
a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race,
a higher-grade race has come in and taken their place."
-- Winston Churchill
Nations are dead. Oceans are dry. Streets are empty. The writing is on
the wall. Blood runs high. Warriors become priests. Priests become
warriors. The guardians are punks. Punks execute traitors. They shoot
them in the back of the head.
Unfortunately, hardly any socialist state had/has complete freedom of
speech. The question is whether freedom of speech should be
guaranteed or not. Should citizens of a socialist state have the right
to say whatever they want? If one votes no on this question, then the
question arises whether that state is self-confident at all. Because if
the state was completely self-confident, then it should not fear any
kind of opposition (in speech, not action). Also, if one votes no, what
does one suggest should be done with those who violate the speech
laws one would like to implement? Gulag? Or merely prison? The point is
that criminalizing speech is a sign of weakness on the part of the
state.
The New Jacobin rule unites. Disunity spells death. Disloyalty is
treason. Punks in red in columns roam. The filth will hide. The filth
will be found. Mercy will be sent to the gulag. Passion forced to work
for unity. Unity will vanquish the coming slaves.
How does one intend to punish those that exercise their right of free
speech (and it is a RIGHT, regardless of whether the state permits free
speech or not)? Ideas themselves can never be reactionary. They can
merely lead to reactionary processes of thought developed on paper or
put into action. But this should not lead advocates of censorship or
criminalizers of speech to think the nonsensical thought that speech
itself can somehow be "subversive" and therefore needs to be
labeled as "criminal" in some cases. The suppression of free
speech is an oriental practice (Pharaonic to be exact) and is
diametrically opposed to the Northern European conception of freedom in
all its aspects (intellectual, physical, etc.). In this regard,
Communism, as it was and is practiced in "socialist" states,
was and is Asiatic tyranny. Without guaranteeing freedom of speech, a
socialist state is an empty shell. Socialism promises liberation. If it
does not liberate speech (and the thoughts that engendered it), it will
erect a false paradise built on coercion and enslavement of the mind.
The White race again expands. Order becomes temporary chaos. Wails and
chains in line! Whips and tanks at the ready! Creators create confusion.
The White race again masters wells and mountains. Steel and the Seal.
Language understood by the ones that only copy.
The veneration of Kim Il Sung is a prime example of the East Asian
tradition of worshipping MEN as idols. It all stems from Confucianism.
This kind of personality cult is totally alien to Northern European
traditions where the leader is in power for the people and not vice
versa. East Asians are genetically inclined to like blending into a
faceless mass of robotic automatons (which is not only what the
Democratic People's Republic of Korea is all about [see their silly
forced Juche study sessions and their mass gymnastics performances] but
capitalist countries like Japan as well [one only needs to think of the
down-bowing workers at the Toyota plant in Tokyo]).
The time is near. The time is here. Guns fired. Rockets launched. Punks
in red across continents ennoble. Lower races elevated as subjects. Lips
lock near the Indian Ocean. On sandy beaches muddy boots are washed.
Finally with a sword the Aryan Christ risen!
For East Asians it is completely normal, probably even good, to
deindiviualize themselves. It is only when this practice is imposed on
Europeans that it becomes a negative thing since Europeans, as opposed
to Asians, prefer freedom over slavery. While socialism in Asia is the
continuation of social conditioning under different economic conditions,
socialism in Europe should be a process of physical and mental
liberation.
Vacant eyes full again. Full of fervent hope. Full of genetic destiny.
Socialism sells salvation. Genetic Socialism glorifies god-souls.
Wrinkled worries smoothened.
If it is practical to manipulate the minds of the people in a Communist
state, what are the benefits reaped from this action? Will people have
automatically more to eat if they are brainwashed? Will they have
definite job security? There is no correlation between the necessity of
establishing a "dictatorship of opinion" and the guarantee
that a Communist state will be a stable one. On the contrary, the
suppression of speech leads to all kinds of social atrophies, including
the retardation of the intellectual scope of the people as a whole (lack
of serious debate [which by definition must include controversial, and
hence censored in a Communist state, viewpoints] and the forced
recitation of state-approved mantras do not freethinking geniuses make
[free thought being a prerequisite for all innovations which spring from
the minds of men]) and the degradation of social conscience (to say what
one does not believe produces snitches [falsely enriching their
"character" by betraying their comrades to the Party which is,
knowing that this is not true, praised as being the "beacon of
truth"]).
The Holocaust happened. The Holocaust did not happen. My dog died. My
dog did not die. Where is the key to unlock with the chastity belt the
White race is wearing? Punks in need to see a scene. Who is eating
dissent? The ones who trust. The walled streets are burning. The fire
consumes stocks.
- Constantin von Hoffmeister
|